Turning Points Rotating Header Image

Pitts on Limbaugh

A friend sent me a link to the following essay by Leonard Pitts, whom I greatly admire as a writer. It isn’t news to any of us that the culture wars are still raging, even though part of the reason so many of us voted for President Obama is because we were thoroughly tired of the hatred and division spewed by the campaign of John McCain and Sarah Palin. I well remember the quote that is the subject of the Mr. Pitts’ essay and at the time, dismissed it because it was entirely expected from Rush Limbaugh. It wasn’t until I read Mr. Pitts’ essay, in which he exposed the entire raison d’etre of gas bags like Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, and the rest of their ilk, that I saw what these hate-mongers are really doing: destroying civil discourse in this country so that they can line their own pockets. In an article dated July 2, 2008, the Associated Press states that Limbaugh will make $38 million a year under his new contract. A recent book by Jack Beatty, Age of Betrayal: the Triumph of Money in America, 1865-1900 offers an insight into what Limbaugh and his fellow-travelers are doing to this country. The Atlantic had a good review of the book in its June 12, 2007 issue.

I’ve read many essays by Leonard Pitts and find almost all of them thoughtful and illuminating, but I’ve not posted any before because I was concerned about copyright violations. But at the bottom of this essay, there are a number of icons, inviting the reader to share the piece, so I am doing just that. You can read additional essays by Mr. Pitts at The Miami Herald.

Far-right Obama critics get a reply

By LEONARD PITTS JR.
lpitts@miamiherald.com

”I hope he fails.” — Limbaugh

It is, of course, a calculated outrage.

Meaning, it was spewed by a clown in the media circus to kick a familiar sequence into motion: angry denunciation by bloggers, pundits and supporters of President Barack Obama (the ”he” whose failure is hoped), followed by Rush Limbaugh refusing to retract a word, a courageous truth teller who will not be moved. And, trailing behind, like the folks with brooms trail the elephants in the circus parade, Limbaugh’s devotees, complaining that their hero has been misquoted, misunderstood or otherwise mistreated. “What Rush meant was . . . yadda yadda yadda.”

A calculated outrage.

And knowing this, knowing how frequently and adroitly media are manipulated by self-promoting media clowns who defame conservatism by calling themselves conservative, one is tempted to let the statement pass, to make its way unimpeded to the dustbin like so many other manufactured controversies. But occasionally, it’s necessary to intercept one of them and hold it up to the light.

This is one of those times. Not because what Limbaugh said on his radio program a few days before the inauguration was an outrage — outrage is the point, remember? — but rather, because of what the thing he said says about him and his fellow clowns.

“I hope he fails.”

Do you ever say that about your president if you are an American who loves your country? Would you say it about George W. Bush, who was disastrous; about Bill Clinton, who was slimy; about Jimmy Carter, who was inept; about Richard Nixon, who was crooked? You may think he’s going to fail, yes. You may warn he’s going to fail, yes.

But do you ever hope he fails? Knowing his failure is the country’s failure? Isn’t that, well . . . disloyal?

The irony is that Limbaugh and the other clowns would have you believe they are bedrock defenders of this country, that they love it more than the rest of us, more than anything.

That’s a lie. Limbaugh just told us so, emphatically.

It’s not the country they love. It’s the attention. The ideology, their perversion of conservatism, is but a means toward that end.

Yes, an observer might point out that it’s counterproductive to give them attention while decrying their love of attention. But, as already noted, occasionally the clowns spew something that cannot, and ought not, be ignored.

Ideological division is nothing new to politics. But has ideology ever taken quite the seat of prominence it now enjoys? Have people ever been quite so prone to regard their ideological identity as more important than their national identity? The last 30 years are rare in that regard, if not unique.

“I hope he fails?!”

So that, what? The defamation of conservatism Limbaugh represents will stand vindicated? The Republicans will pick up a few seats in the midterm election? Limbaugh’s ”side” — his word — will score points?

A sense of mission

Is this only a game, then? No lives at stake, no future on the line, no planet in the balance? Just a game?

I hope he bricks this free throw.

I hope he fumbles that pass.

I hope he fails.

And to hell with the country.

The country doesn’t matter. The ”side” does. And Limbaugh’s side seems angry in power and angry out. It’s as if anger is all they really have.

Barack Obama was elected in large part on a promise to carry the nation past anger, past the notion that either party has a monopoly on wisdom, past the belief that ideology is identity. He was elected because people want a sense of mission that makes them feel like Americans again.

If he is successful, Limbaugh and the other clowns will face tough sledding in a radically different world. Small wonder he is so eager to strangle this presidency in its infancy. And need it even be said?

I hope he fails.

3 Comments on “Pitts on Limbaugh”

  1. #1 Beth
    on Jan 27th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    Thanks for featuring this essay, Jeff. As you know, I love Leonard Pitts’ writing, too. Whatever the subject, he approaches it in the most thoughtful, intelligent, and measured way, and this piece is no exception. And he’s right–Rush Limbaugh’s main objective always is to say or do whatever it takes to make sure that he can keep making millions spewing his spiteful rubbish. The thought of Rush Limbaugh arouses in me the most un-Christian thoughts.

    Great post, as always.

  2. #2 June
    on Jan 27th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    Thanks so much for bringing this essay to me….

  3. #3 Debi Kelly Van Cleave
    on Jan 28th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    I know! I read that in the paper and I thought he made an excellent point! That’s what they’re doing–spewing hatred to get money. It’s like he’s inciting a pack of dogs by giving them a taste of blood. Riling them up and getting them all excited so they won’t think straight. Why can’t the conservatives see how they are being used?

    http://www.GreenerPastures–ACityGirlGoesCountry.blogspot.com

Leave a Comment