HomePoliticsThe Bush Legacy

For several years now, there have been strident calls from the Left to prosecute officials of the Bush administration as war criminals. President-elect Obama has said that if crimes were committed, they need to be investigated but at the same time, he does not want his first term to be one seen as a partisan witch hunt against Republicans. This is certainly understandable and a focus on the legacy of the Bush administration’s shredding of the Constitution and its’ unilateral prosecution of its’ “war on terror” would detract from the arguably urgent necessity of resuscitating the economy. Still, justice and the rule of law demand an investigation into the abuses of the Bush administration. Scott Horton’s article, Justice after Bush: prosecuting an outlaw administration, in the December issue of Harper’s Magazine provides an outline of how this process might unfold. I thought it was a thoughtful, practical assessment of both the problems involved and the possibilities of success. The last two sentences of the article may well prove prophetic: “[r]ight now, the administration looms large and justice seems distant. That perspective will change significantly with the passage of time.”


Comments

The Bush Legacy — 1 Comment

  1. I happen to be among those who feel ignoring what happened in the past because it’s yesterday’s news is wrong. All crimes happened in the past. If this logic were to be carried through, we shouldn’t prosecute any crime. But I do understand the need not to have the country torn apart at this time when it’s critical that Obama get things done. It’s causing quite a bit of dissonance within. Perhaps the commission of inquiry is a good option to pursue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>