{"id":1543,"date":"2009-10-03T15:11:49","date_gmt":"2009-10-03T19:11:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/iomaire.com\/?p=1543"},"modified":"2009-10-03T16:18:08","modified_gmt":"2009-10-03T20:18:08","slug":"promoting-civil-society","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/2009\/10\/03\/promoting-civil-society\/","title":{"rendered":"Promoting Civil Society"},"content":{"rendered":"

Some of what I’ve posted in the last year could be understood as veering dangerously close to engaging in conspiracy theories, particularly when I have used the words “financial elite”, “oligarchy”, and “ruling classes”. There is a fine line to be navigated between seeing the world run by a New World Order, a Project for a New American Century, a Bilderberg Group or any of a myriad of other iconic groups that consumes the conspiracist right and a deepening concern over changes that, over time, have resulted in the United States moving from a world<\/a> that featured many tens of thousands of small economic players to the world we presently inhabit, a world populated by enormous multi-national corporations that dominate the agenda and suffocate any alternative to their world view. Many of those who take part in Tea Party rallies are rightly concerned about what is happening to their country, but lack the education to clearly understand what needs to be done. Others participating in those rallies are members of the idiotosphere, a word memorably coined by Mark Morford in his article<\/a>. Unfortunately, it seems as those on the left have become preoccupied with the idiotosphere, devoting endless amounts of time to trying to understand and comprehend their world view. I certainly have devoted a lot of time trying to understand the people who worship Sarah Palin. But the time has come to move on and create the change we believe in. As Chris Berlet states in the following article, there are “three R\u2019s of civil society: Rebut, Rebuke, Re-Affirm: Rebut false and misleading statements and beliefs without name-calling; rebuke those national figures spreading misinformation; and re-affirm strong and clear arguments to defend goals and proposed programs.” In this article, Mr. Berlet defines conspiracism and shows that what spews from the mouths of the right-wing populists is not an “expression of a healthy political skepticism about state power or legitimate calls for reform or radical challenges to government or corporate abuses. This is an irrational anxiety that pictures the world as governed by powerful long-standing covert conspiracies of evildoers who control politics, the economy, and all of history.” If what Mr. Berlet writes rings true to you, you may find much more information at his website, The Public Eye<\/a>. The organization of The Public Eye website is a little difficult to navigate and finding particular articles can be difficult without using the search engine on the site. This particular article was published on the Indypendent<\/a> website and is archived at The Public Eye here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Conspiracy Nation<\/h3>\n

Right-wing demagogues reach out to a supposedly beleagured white middle class, telling them they are being squeezed by parasitic traitors from above and below.
\n<\/h4>\n

Even before Barack Obama was sworn in as the 44th president of the United States, the internet was seething with lurid conspiracy theories exposing his alleged subversion and treachery.<\/p>\n

Among the many false claims: Obama was a secret Muslim; he was not a native U.S. citizen and his election as president should be overturned; he was a tool of the New World Order in a plot to merge the government of the United States into a North American union with Mexico and Canada.<\/p>\n

Within hours of Obama\u2019s inauguration, claims circulated that Obama was not really president because Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts scrambled the words as he administered the oath of office. A few days after the inauguration came a warning that Obama planned to impose martial law and collect all guns.<\/p>\n

Many of these false claims recall those floated by right-wing conspiracy theorists in the armed citizens\u2019 militia movement during the Clinton administration \u2014 allegations that percolated up through the media and were utilized by Republican political operatives to hobble the legislative agenda of the Democratic Party.<\/p>\n

The conspiracy theory attacks on Clinton bogged down the entire government. Legislation became stuck in congressional committees, appointments to federal posts dwindled and positions remained unfilled, almost paralyzing some agencies and seriously hampering the federal courts.<\/p>\n

A similar scenario is already hobbling the work of the Obama administration. The histrionics at congressional town hall meetings and conservative rallies is not simply craziness \u2014 it is part of an effective right-wing campaign based on scare tactics that have resonated throughout U.S. history among a white middle class fearful of alien ideas, people of color and immigrants.<\/p>\n

Unable to block the appointment of Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right-wing media demagogues, corporate political operatives, Christian right theocrats, and economic libertarians have targeted healthcare reform and succeeded in sidetracking the public option and single-payer proposals.<\/p>\n

A talented environmental adviser to the Obama administration, Van Jones, was hounded into resigning Sept. 5 by a McCarthyite campaign of red-baiting and hyperbole. Support for major labor law reform has been eroding.<\/p>\n

With a wink and a nod, right-wing apparatchiks are networking with the apocalyptic Christian right and resurgent armed militias \u2014 a volatile mix of movements awash in conspiracy theories. Scratch the surface and you find people peddling bogus conspiracy theories about liberal secular humanists, collectivist labor bosses, Muslim terrorists, Jewish cabals, homosexual child molesters and murderous abortionists.<\/p>\n

This right-wing campaign is about scapegoating bogus targets by using conspiracy theories to distract attention from insurance companies who are the real culprits behind escalating healthcare costs.<\/p>\n

Examples of right-wing conspiracy theories include the false claim that healthcare reform will include government bureaucrat \u201cDeath Panels\u201d pulling the plug on grandma. Another is the claim that Obama is appointing unconstitutional project \u201cCzars\u201d More fraudulent conspiracy theories are being generated every week.<\/p>\n

The core narrative of many popular conspiracy theories is that \u201cthe people\u201d are held down by a conspiracy of wealthy secret elites manipulating a vast legion of corrupt politicians, mendacious journalists, propagandizing schoolteachers, nefarious bankers and hidden subversive cadres.<\/p>\n

This is not an expression of a healthy political skepticism about state power or legitimate calls for reform or radical challenges to government or corporate abuses. This is an irrational anxiety that pictures the world as governed by powerful long-standing covert conspiracies of evildoers who control politics, the economy, and all of history. Scholars call this worldview \u201cconspiracism.\u201d<\/p>\n

The term conspiracism, according to historian Frank P. Mintz, denotes a \u201cbelief in the primacy of conspiracies in the unfolding of history.\u201d Mintz explains: \u201cConspiracism serves the needs of diverse political and social groups in America and elsewhere. It identifies elites, blames them for economic and social catastrophes, and assumes that things will be better once popular action can remove them from positions of power. As such, conspiracy theories do not typify a particular epoch or ideology.\u201d<\/p>\n

When conspiracism becomes a mass phenomenon, persons seeking to protect the nation from the alleged conspiracy create counter movements to halt the subversion. Historians dub them countersubversives.<\/p>\n

The resulting right-wing populist conspiracy theories point upward toward \u201cparasitic elites\u201d seen as promoting collectivist and socialist schemes leading to tyranny. At the same time, the counter-subversives point downward toward the \u201cundeserving poor\u201d who are seen as lazy and sinful and being riled up by subversive community organizers. Sound familiar?<\/p>\n

Right-wing demagogues reach out to this supposedly beleaguered white middle class of \u201cproducers\u201d and encourage them to see themselves as being inexorably squeezed by parasitic traitors above and below. The rage is directed upwards against a caricature of the conspiratorial \u201cfaceless bureaucrats,\u201d \u201cbanksters\u201d and \u201cplutocrats\u201d rather than challenging an unfair economic system run on behalf of the wealthy and corporate interests. The attacks and oppression generated by this populist white rage, however, is painfully felt by people lower on the socio-economic ladder, and historically this has been people of color, immigrants and other marginalized groups.<\/p>\n

It is this overarching counter-subversive conspiracy theory that has mobilized so many people; and the clueless Democrats have been caught unaware by the tactics of right-wing populism used successfully for the last 100 years and chronicled by dozens of authors.<\/p>\n

The techniques for mobilizing countersubversive right-wing populists include \u201ctools of fear\u201d: dualism, demonization, scapegoating, and apocalyptic aggression.<\/p>\n

When these are blended with conspiracy theories about elite and lazy parasites, the combination is toxic to democracy.<\/p>\n

DUALISM<\/h4>\n

Dualism is simply the tendency to see the world in a binary model in which the forces of absolute good are struggling against the forces of absolute evil. This can be cast in religious or secular story lines or \u201cnarratives.\u201d<\/p>\n

SCAPEGOATING<\/h4>\n

Scapegoating involves wrongly stereotyping a person or group of people as sharing negative traits and blaming them for societal problems, while the primary source of the problem (if it is real) is overlooked or absolved of blame. Scapegoating can become a mass phenomenon when a social or political movement does the stereotyping. It is easier to scapegoat a group if it is first demonized.<\/p>\n

DEMONIZATION<\/h4>\n

Demonization is a process through which people target individuals or groups as the embodiment of evil, turning individuals in scapegoated groups into an undifferentiated, faceless force threatening the idealized community. The sequence moves from denigration to dehumanization to demonization, and each step generates an increasing level of hatred of the objectified and scapegoated \u201cOther.\u201d<\/p>\n

One way to demonize a target group is to claim that the scapegoated group is plotting against the public good. This often involves demagogic appeals.<\/p>\n

CONSPIRACISM<\/h4>\n

Conspiracism frames demonized enemies \u201cas part of a vast insidious plot against the common good, while it valorizes the scapegoater as a hero for sounding the alarm.\u201d Conspiracist thinking can move easily from the margins to the mainstream, as has happened repeatedly in the United States. Several scholars have argued that historic and contemporary conspiracism, especially the apocalyptic form, is a more widely shared worldview in the United States than in most other industrialized countries.<\/p>\n

Conspiracism gains a mass following in times of social, cultural, economic, or political stress. The issues of immigration, demands for racial or gender equality, gay rights, power struggles between nations, wars \u2014 all can be viewed through a conspiracist lens.<\/p>\n

Historian Richard Hofstadter established the leading analytical framework in the 1960s for studying conspiracism in public settings in his essay, \u201cThe Paranoid Style in American Politics.\u201d He identified \u201cthe central preconception\u201d of the paranoid style as a belief in the \u201cexistence of a vast, insidious, preternaturally effective international conspiratorial network designed to perpetrate acts of the most fiendish character.\u201d<\/p>\n

According to Hofstadter, this was common in certain figures in the political right, and was accompanied with a \u201csense that his political passions are unselfish and patriotic\u201d which \u201cgoes far to intensify his feeling of righteousness and his moral indignation.\u201d<\/p>\n

According to Michael Barkun, professor of political science at Syracuse University, conspiracism attracts people because conspiracy theorists \u201cclaim to explain what others can\u2019t. They appear to make sense out of a world that is otherwise confusing.\u201d There is an appealing simplicity in dividing the world sharply into good and bad and tracing \u201call evil back to a single source, the conspirators and their agents.\u201d<\/p>\n

COVER OBAMA\u2019S BACK, BUT KICK HIS BUTT<\/h4>\n

Today, when you hear the right-wing demagogues whipping up the anti-Obama frenzy, you now know they are speaking a coded language that traces back to Social Darwinist defenses of \u201cFree Market\u201d capitalism and to xenophobic white supremacy. The voices of Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, O\u2019Reilly, Coulter, Dobbs and their allies are singing a new melody using old right-wing populist lyrics. The damage they can do is great even if most of these movements eventually collapse.<\/p>\n

The centrist Democratic spinmeisters surrounding Obama have no idea how to organize a grassroots defense of healthcare reform. That\u2019s pathetic.<\/p>\n

These are the three R\u2019s of civil society: Rebut, Rebuke, Re-Affirm: Rebut false and misleading statements and beliefs without name-calling; rebuke those national figures spreading misinformation; and re-affirm strong and clear arguments to defend goals and proposed programs.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s exactly what President Obama did on in his nationally televised address Sept. 9.<\/p>\n

While keeping our eyes on the prize of universal, quality healthcare, we must also prevent right-wing populism as a social movement from spinning out of control. Since Obama\u2019s inauguration, there have been nine murders tied to white supremacist ideology laced with conspiracy theories. It is already happening here.<\/p>\n

Since centrist Democrats are selling us out, it is time for labor and community organizers to turn up the heat. We should defend Obama against the vicious and racist attacks from the reactionary political right, but we can have Obama\u2019s back while we are kicking his butt.<\/p>\n

Vigorous social movements pull political movements and politicians in their direction \u2014 not the other way around. We need to raise some hell in the streets and in the suites.<\/p>\n

Chip Berlet, senior analyst at Political Research Associates, is the author of the recent study \u201cToxic to Democracy;\u201d and is co-author with Matthew N. Lyons of Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort.<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

RIGHT WING POPULISM<\/h4>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

Populist movements frequently adopt conspiracy theories of power, regardless of their ideological position on the political spectrum.<\/p>\n

In her book Populism<\/em>, Margaret Canovan defined four types of political populism. Populist democracy is championed by progressives from the LaFollettes of Wisconsin to Jesse Jackson.<\/p>\n

However, the other three types \u2014 politicians\u2019 populism, reactionary populism and populist dictatorship \u2014 are antidemocratic forms of right-wing populism. These were characterized in various combinations in the 1990s by Ross Perot, Pat Robertson, Pat Buchanan and David Duke \u2014 four straight white Christian men trying to ride the same horse.<\/p>\n

Two versions of right-wing populism are current in both the United States and Europe: one centered around \u201cget the government off my back\u201d economic libertarianism, coupled with a rejection of mainstream political parties, which is more attractive to the upper-middle class and small entrepreneurs. The other is based on xenophobia and ethnocentric nationalism, which is more attractive to the lower middle class and wage workers. These two groupings unite behind candidates that attack the current regime since both constituencies identify an intrusive government as the cause of their grievances.<\/p>\n

-CB<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Some of what I’ve posted in the last year could be understood as veering dangerously close to engaging in conspiracy theories, particularly when I have used the words “financial elite”, “oligarchy”, and “ruling classes”. There is a fine line to …<\/span> Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1543"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1554,"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543\/revisions\/1554"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iomaire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}